![]() ![]() I don’t know how well seahorse stacks up against the above requirements or anyone else’s requirements. The ideal answer would be one that is well-integrated with the underlying system, including being able to be protected by an ‘hardware’ security token (like a Librem Key). (3) You will get a menu Authentication app > Start > Enter password. Some people though really want the network / synch side of it. (2) From the left menu > More > Settings and privacy > Security and account access > Security > Two-factor authentication > Two-factor authentication > Check authentication app. You can of course provide your own server. It can’t be fully open source if you rely on an external server for network integration / synchronisation. ![]() I have never been comfortable enough with that idea - so it would be local database for me. You can read more about how this whole process came together on Github here. Sub-question: Is it a good idea to use a password manager with network integration / synchronisation? Strongbox supports YubiKey protected databases (using the KeePassXC challenge-response mode). Overall, yes, I would say using a password manager is a good idea. KeePassXC presents a (pseudo-)random challenge (the databases master seed, which changes every time you re-encrypt, i.e., save your database) to the YubiKey and gets a unique response in return. Poorly integrated also, so you always need to type in the password, which can be error prone and may encourage slightly weaker passwords. If your threat model includes government agencies or other criminal organisations then this is not a secure option. Can be inconvenient if you need a password while out and about. Overall this release brings significant stability and usability improvements to. Thank you for your patience and detailed reports that allowed us to fix these problems. This update comes with additional fixes to reported issues after our initial release. Some home locations might be inappropriate for this. Today we are releasing the second maintenance update for the 2.5 baseline, KeePassXC 2.5.2. A work location is inherently less secure (more threatened) than a home location. KeePassXC with a custom manifest (uses native messaging to communicate) 3. KeePass application with KeePassHttp installed 2. ![]() This extension supports the following applications: 1. Writing them all down? That’s a fairly secure to very secure option, depending on your threat model. commented Store TOTP code in KeepassXC Install browser extension and link Try to login to a website and and have KeepassXC-Browser fill in your TOTP code. The OTP credential can optionally be saved in SHA-256 encryption to make sure your OTP secrets are safe. However forgetting passwords may be a problem, particularly if not used for a while - and it could encourage sloppy habits like using weaker passwords or reusing passwords. Is it a good idea to use a password manager? Why/why not?Ĭompared to remembering every password in your head? That’s the most secure option. KeePassXC supports time-based one-time password (TOTP) storage and generation, and its also compatible with common two-factor authentication methods like. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |